SUpport for the M17 protocol?
SUpport for the M17 protocol?
Folks, is there any chance that support for the new M17 protocol could be added in the next revision of Pistar?
SUpport for the M17 protocol?
Hello
I have a working M17 implementation for the pi-star.
I’ve opened a pull request to discuss it.
This is the PR: https://github.com/AndyTaylorTweet/Pi-S ... h/pull/140
I have a working M17 implementation for the pi-star.
I’ve opened a pull request to discuss it.
This is the PR: https://github.com/AndyTaylorTweet/Pi-S ... h/pull/140
Re: SUpport for the M17 protocol?
Alessio,IU5BON wrote: ↑Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:25 am Hello
I have a working M17 implementation for the pi-star.
I’ve opened a pull request to discuss it.
This is the PR: https://github.com/AndyTaylorTweet/Pi-S ... h/pull/140
It would seem that I owe you an apology, in discussion with the admin team, we have deleted one or more of your posts discussing M17 (assuming it to be a duplicate), for that I am most certainly sorry. I'm in discussion with the other admins to make sure we avoid that scenario in the future.
Directly in relation to M17, I've only had a brief look at your PR so far (the run up to and through Christmas has been mighty busy), I'll see how much of it we can use and if i need to change much. Thank you for your work, let me assure you I will give it much more attention soon.
In general we avoid discussions on modifications to Pi-Star because supporting modified versions is more than any of the admins have enough time for, again I would point out that we value your efforts here however.
Feel free to reach out to me directly if you need to [email protected]